OK! goes here – There are many opinions on Religion vs. Science ..?
My question is – everyone is so certain (religious) that the earth and all the God created 6000yrs! But who was there to record this event? Surely the author of the Book of Genesis and wants proof, not just listen I called proclaimed god of all he really has done this. And please do not quote Scripture "is plagiarism!" In my opinion, there was none, so no evidence other than a story! but there is much evidence to support evolution! And common sense also dictates! Plagiarism means simply copy! OK! thick for you there! I'm bored now! Any religion is false! Bye!
Evidence to support evolution, perhaps, evidence to support the development Indellible ?……. No, I did not think so. Oh yes one more, if quoting the Bible passage is plagiarism (ie, if the state is lol) By the use of "evidence" Others have discovered, as you say support the change, it would be equally unacceptable is not it? NOTE "Thick" is what the dictionary says means plagiarism: plagiarism n 1: a piece of writing that has been copied by someone else and is presented as your own work 2: the act of plagiarism, taking someone's words or ideas as if they were their own [syn: plagiarism, plagiarisation, piracy], so I see my colleague, to quote the Bible and the Bible state is in no way be regarded as plagiarism, could ???????
DNA vs. the Book of Mormon
